Score breakdown

Fairness Through Awareness

paper-0058 · paper · 2012

Cynthia Dwork et al.

The formal-fairness research programme begins.

Academic, score -0.1674

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent3379.00.015210.50.007605OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.1recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent15.01.00.050.05OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Broad Influence, score 0.2030

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent3379.00.015210.20.003042OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.125recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent15.01.00.40.4OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.075recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

Governance Practitioner, score -0.2212

MetricStatusValueNorm.WeightContributionSourceConfidenceProvenance
citation_countpresent3379.00.015210.250.003803OpenAlexhighlink
library_holdingsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.15recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed
readership_persistencepresent15.01.00.10.1OpenAlexmediumlink
syllabus_adoptionsmissingrecorded as missing, penalized by rule, never imputed−0.175recorded as missing; penalized by rule, never imputed

A rank is not a verdict on intrinsic worth. It is a transparent output of declared evidence, weights, and missing-data rules at a specific release date.

Disagree with this rank or a number? Challenge it with your evidence. Every challenge gets a public identifier and a published resolution.